Educator Resources
June Meeting Minutes 2010
Date: June 3 and 4, 2010 |
|||
Members Present |
|||
Debra Colley, co-chair |
Rosemary Harrigan |
Susan Mittler |
|
MEMBERS ABSENT |
|||
Sheila Appel |
Khalek Kirkland |
|
|
STAFF PRESENT |
|||
| Robert Bentley Patricia Oleaga-Gill |
|||
June 3, 2010 |
|||
| 1. Call to Order | The first session of Day One of the meeting was called to order by the co-chairs at 3:15 p.m. |
||
2. May Meeting Follow-up/ Announcements |
The co-chairs
|
||
3.Report out |
The co-chairs reported on their meeting with Commissioner Steiner. They discussed the Race to the Top agenda. Commissioner Steiner conveyed optimism with the states placement for round two. They also discussed the Mentoring Standards and their importance. |
||
4. Meeting Minutes |
Motion postponed: |
||
5.Subcommittee Reports |
Professional Practices Subcommittee: Rosemary Harrigan, chair, reported that the subcommittee met on June 3rd, prior to the full board meeting. The subcommittee reviewed 18 Part 83 cases, and that they had reviewed a total of 89 Part 83 cases during the 2009-2010 meeting year. Higher Education subcommittee: Lloyd Jaeger, chair, reported the subcommittee had discussed the discontinuation of RATE and what role the subcommittee will have in the future. |
||
6. Policy Review |
Bob Bentley and Joe Frey opened the meeting with a questions and answer session.
|
||
7. Adjournment |
The co-chairs adjourned Day One of the meeting at 5:37 p.m. |
||
June 4, 2010 |
|||
1. Call to Order |
Day Two of the meeting was called to order by the co-chairs at 9:30 a.m. |
||
2. Mentoring Standards Final Draft |
The full board reviewed the final draft of the Mentoring Standards. Special thanks was extended to Carolyn Williams of NYSUT and Nancy Brennan for their expertise and guidance during the development of the standards. Motion: That the Final Draft of the Mentoring Standards be approved with the understanding copy edits will follow. |
||
3. Performance Based Assessments |
Pam Sandoval reported on the progress of the development of the Teaching Standards and how the Teaching Standards will be used as a basis for the development of the new Performance Based Assessments for teacher certification. Pam suggested Pearson be invited to join the board to discuss the results of the performance assessment pilot and Pearson’s methods to establish the validity and reliability of the new assessments. |
||
4. Annual Report to the Regents |
Members reviewed a draft of this year’s annual report to the Regents and suggested modifications. |
||
5. Priority Agenda for 2010 -2011 |
The co-chairs facilitated the development of a priority agenda for 2010-2011. |
||
6. Evaluation |
End of year evaluations were handed out and collected. |
||
7. Adjournment |
The co-chairs adjourned Day Two of the meeting at 12:32 p.m. |
||
