New York State Education Department seal THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT /
THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK /
ALBANY, NY 12234

TO:

The Honorable the Members of the Board of Regents

FROM:

Johanna Duncan-Poitier

COMMITTEE:

Higher Education and Professional Practice

TITLE OF ITEM:

Update on Alternative Teacher Preparation Programs

DATE OF SUBMISSION:

October 18, 2004

PROPOSED HANDLING:

Discussion

RATIONALE FOR ITEM:

To provide regular updates on elements of the Regents teaching policy

STRATEGIC GOALS:

Goals 2 and 3

AUTHORIZATION(S):

 


SUMMARY:

        Each year since the Board of Regents approved the offering of alternative teacher preparation (ATP) programs by New York State colleges and universities, the Office of Higher Education has provided a report on the activities and status of those programs.  In response to the request for information by the Board of Regents, the attached report for academic year 2003-2004 reflects specific data about the programs, beginning with the Teaching Fellows Program.  

          During the report year, ATP programs were offered by 12 colleges and universities in New York City through the Teaching Fellows Program and by 6 upstate colleges.  The focus of the programs is the preparation of additional teachers in the high need fields of mathematics, the sciences, and special education.  In 2003-2004, 47 percent of ATP candidates in New York City and 96 percent of upstate candidates were prepared in these 3 fields.  Over 2,800 ATP candidates began teaching in 2003-2004 in New York State. 

          In 2004-2005, the New York City Department of Education (NYC DOE) instituted a city-wide mentoring program for all new teachers, including Teaching Fellows.  During the first year, between 5,500 and 6,000 new teachers will receive mentoring.  There were over 300 prepared mentors in place for Teaching Fellows on the first day of school. 

          Staff in the Office of College and University Evaluation (OCUE) has continued to monitor ATP programs through dedicated on-site visits or as a component of teacher education program accreditation visits.  In addition, during the summer of 2003, staff conducted one-day visits to the introductory components of all 12 New York City Teaching Fellows Program colleges.

Alternative Teacher Preparation in New York State

2003-2004 Annual Report

Alternative teacher preparation (ATP) is a relatively small but important source of teachers for hard-to-staff schools and subject areas in New York State.  By design, ATP programs are partnerships among institutions of higher education (IHEs), local school districts, teachers’ unions, and teacher candidates.  Candidates in these programs must meet all the requirements for initial teaching certificates by the end of their programs. 

This report describes New York State ATP programs as of June 2004.  Part 1 looks at trends from school year 2000-2001, when ATP programs began in New York State, through the end of school year 2003-2004.  Part 2 describes program support and outreach efforts during 2003-2004.  Part 3 provides detailed information about new Fellows entering the New York City Teaching Fellows program in fall 2003. 
 

PART 1

General Program Update

Scope.

             From July 2000 to June 2004, the number of colleges and universities offering ATP programs grew from 3 to 18.  The number of ATP candidates beginning teaching increased from 314 in 2000-2001 to over 2,800 in 2003-2004 (See Table 1.1). Over 92 percent of the new candidates were in the New York City Teaching Fellows program.  Appendix 1 includes the names of IHEs offering these programs in 2003-2004.
 


Table 1.1

ATP Program Growth

Fall 2000 through January 2004

Based on the Number of Candidates Starting to Teach

Academic Year

Cohort

Colleges and Universities Participating Each Year

New ATP Candidates

NYC

Upstate

Total

NYC

Upstate

Total

00-01

00-01

2000  Fall

2001 January

  3

  2

0

0

  3

  2

  314

    71

  0

  0

    385

01-02

01-02

2001 Fall

2002 January

13

  1

2

0

15

  1

1,094

    36

 62

   0

1,192

02-03

2002 Fall

15

3

18

1,829

 82

1,911

03-04

03-04

03-04

2003 Fall

2003 Rolling

2004 January

12

  1

  2

6

0

0

18

  1

  2

2,442

     83

     86

  79

143

    0

2,833

Total new candidates at 12 NYC and 6 upstate colleges/universities

5,955

366

6,321


SOURCES:  NYC DOE (updated data) and upstate colleges, fall 2004.
NOTE: Colleges with Rolling and January cohorts also had fall cohorts.

Focus.

  When ATP programs were first authorized by the Board of Regents, colleges and universities registered a broad range of programs in this format.  Since then, institutions have narrowed the focus to the high-need subject areas.  In New York City in 2003-2004, 47 percent of Teaching Fellows started teaching in the high-need areas of math, the sciences, and special education.  Upstate, 96 percent of ATP candidates were in math, the sciences, and special education programs.  This change in focus represents the responsiveness of these programs in meeting local needs.

Impact.

            Since their inception in 2000-2001, ATP programs have prepared over 6,000 individuals to begin teaching careers.  The New York City Department of Education (NYC DOE) reports that there are 6,000 teachers employed in the City who entered the profession through various cohorts of the Teaching Fellows Program (including the 2004-05 cohort).

Principals throughout the State continue to provide anecdotal reports of their high levels of satisfaction with teachers prepared through ATP programs.  In addition, at the end of each academic year the NYC DOE conducts a survey of principals who employ Teaching Fellows.  The 2003-2004 survey continued to show satisfaction with ATP candidates in affecting gains in student achievement and understanding the subject matter they were teaching.   A research team, with Principal Investigator Professor James Wyckoff, is conducting a longitudinal study of the effectiveness of New York City teachers prepared through a variety of routes.  Reports from the research will be released soon to provide more information about the influence of Teaching Fellows on student achievement; the full report should be released in early 2007.

Oversight. 

          OCUE staff continue to monitor ATP programs through site visits and through e-mail contact.  When a college or university that has ATP programs is scheduled for a teacher accreditation site visit, a review of ATP programs becomes a focused part of the visit.  In cases where an accreditation visit is not scheduled during the academic year, staff make dedicated site visits to ATP programs.   During 2003-2004, 5 dedicated site visits were made, with 1 resulting in an unsatisfactory report.  The institution receiving the unsatisfactory report was required to provide additional information and to make changes in its ATP program prior to accepting a new 2004 cohort.  Frequent e-mail and phone contact is continuing with the program director, and a follow-up visit will be made to this college during early 2005.  Accreditation site visits resulted in 2 satisfactory program reviews.  In addition, during the summer of 2003, staff conducted one-day visits to the introductory components of all 12 college and university partners in the New York City Teaching Fellows Program.  These visits resulted in satisfactory reports.

Teacher retention. 

          To effectively address teacher shortages, ATP programs must prepare teachers who can effect change in their students and who stay in teaching.  The NYC DOE considers a Fellow to be “retained” when the Fellow remains in or completes the Teaching Fellows program and is teaching for the NYC DOE.  The first-year retention rate for the 2003-2004 cohort of Teaching Fellows was 93 percent.  The retention rates over longer periods of time in Table 1.2 are in the same range as other rates reported for New York City and the nation (Lankford, Wyckoff and Papa, 2000; NCES, 2004).  All partners in New York City and upstate ATP programs continue to examine recruitment, selection, placement, graduate programs, and school-based support in order to understand the causes of attrition and to improve retention rates. 

 


Table 1.2

 Retention Rates for New York City Teaching Fellows

Fall 2000 through Fall 2003 Cohorts

 

Cohort

 

Start Pre-Service Training

Jun-00

Jan-01

Jun-01

Jan-02

Jun-02

Jun-03

 

Date School

Started

Sep-00

Feb-01

Sep-01

Feb-02

Sep-02

Sep-03

Totals

Started Teaching Year 1

314

100%

71

100%

1,094

100%

36

100%

  1,829

100%

2,442

100%

5,786

Finished Teaching Year 1

270

86%

66

93%

940

86%

33

92%

1,655

90%

2,259

93%

90%

Started Teaching Year 2

256

82%

60

85%

837

77%

32

89%

1,557

85%

 

 

82%

Finished Teaching Year 2

241

77%

55

77%

815

74%

29

81%

1,520

83%

 

 

80%

Started Teaching Year 3

209

67%

52

73%

701

64%

28

78%

 

 

 

 

65%

Finished Teaching Year 3

200

64%

51

72%

674

62%

25

69%

 

 

 

 

62%

Started Teaching Year 4

Finished Teaching Year 4

168

164

54%

52%

39

36

55%

51%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

54%

52%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

55%

2

58%

36

67%

1

81%

32

87%

NA

 

 

NOTE:  Data provided by the NYC DOE through payroll actions recorded as of July 2004 payroll.  Data does not include the 2003 Rolling nor the 2004 January cohorts that are included in Table 1.2.
 

  • January cohort benchmarks correspond with beginning and end of school year, not service year, and are not included in totals column percentages.
  • Retention percentages are shown as a percent of those who began teaching in year one.
  • Numbers include all active teachers in good standing as Teaching Fellows, including those on an authorized leave.

PART 2

Continuation of federal grants. 

          Based on annual progress reports submitted to the U.S. Department of Education, the Teacher Quality Enhancement ($464,815) and the Transition to Teaching ($400,000) grants were continued for 2003-2004.  These grants enable us to award funds on a competitive basis to independent institutions working as partners in the New York City Teaching Fellows Program.  We also received $153,592 in supplemental HEA funds.  These funds are being used to support two projects:
  • Through the SUNY Research Foundation, Professor James Wyckoff is conducting an evaluation of 2003-2004 and 2004-2005 Teaching Fellows working in grades 3 through 5. The study will analyze student achievement, cohort retention, college supervision, college coursework, and school-based mentoring, thus contributing greatly to our knowledge of the effects of the Teaching Fellows Program.  Results of this study are expected in the fall of 2006.
     
  • Pace University conducted a pilot of the “Rolling Fellows” approach that prepares additional Teaching Fellows to begin teaching during an academic year. These new teachers are used to provide permanent replacements for teachers who leave during the academic year. The pilot program included candidates in mathematics, bilingual elementary education, the sciences, and English.  Most of the candidates were placed in teaching positions by the end of the fall 2003 semester.  Eighty-three candidates began the program and 75 are still teaching, for a retention rate of 90 percent.

Project Leadership Team (PLT).

          As part of our federal grant projects, we have established a Project Leadership Team (PLT) comprised of representatives from institutions receiving project funds, the NYC DOE, and SED.  In the four meetings held during 2003-2004, the PLT discussed issues and strategies for improving ATP programs, developed an evaluation plan for the two grant programs, and shared best practices, including the assessment of teacher candidates.  On March 5, 2004, the PLT sponsored a statewide meeting of ATP programs that was attended by 60 representatives of IHEs and other interested organizations.  The meeting included presentations on selection and placement of candidates, forming partnerships with PreK-12 schools, and candidate support, as well as roundtable discussions on topics affecting ATP programs.

Outreach

          As an outreach effort, a brochure was prepared in Spanish and English for use at the 17th annual Somos El Futuro Conference in April.  The brochure introduced prospective candidates to ATP programs and included contact information for colleges offering ATP programs.

Innovative new ATP program

.  In December 2003, SUNY Empire State College received approval for their ATP programs to be offered at seven locations throughout New York State beginning in fall 2004.  The College applied for and received an ESEA Transition to Teaching grant totaling $2.4 million to implement their innovative program using technology to support the program and its candidates.

Mentoring update

.  The NYC DOE has budgeted $36 million for 2004-2005 to implement a city-wide mentoring program for all first-year teachers.  Approximately 300 mentors have been trained by the New Teacher Center from the University of California, Santa Cruz.  Representatives from the New Teacher Center will work with New York City’s recently hired Director of New Teacher Induction and Regional Directors of New Teacher Induction to implement the mentoring plan.  Between 5,500 and 6,000 new teachers, including Teaching Fellows, will be mentored this year.  IHE representatives report that most Teaching Fellows began the 2004-2005 academic year with mentors assigned and in place. 

Continuing dialogue

.  Discussions are continuing with the NYC DOE and other partners on how to prepare and use the “second written agreement” that details continued mentoring and ways to meet individual learning needs of ATP candidates following the initial eight weeks of mentored teaching.  Part of this discussion centers on the roles of each of the participants in the joint meetings that are to take place every three months during the first year of mentored teaching as required by Part 52.21(b)(3)(xvii) of the Commissioner’s Regulations.  At this time, partners appear to be seriously working together to fully comply with regulations.

PART 3

Fall 2003 New York City Teaching Fellows 

The New York City Department of Education (NYC DOE) provided the Department with more detailed data on New York City Teaching Fellows (Fellows) who started teaching in fall 2003 than on any previous cohort of Fellows as part of evaluation efforts related to the two federal grants.  The tables in this report are descriptive, but do not imply cause and effect.

Schools with fall 2003 Fellows

.  A total of 2,442 Fellows started teaching in fall 2003, of which 2,430 were assigned to 719 schools and 12 to assignments that were not school-specific.  More than half of the Fellows were in schools in the Bronx and Brooklyn, but Fellows were assigned to every borough (See Table 2.1).

 

Table 2.1

Distribution of Fall 2003 Fellows and Their Schools by Borough

Borough

Number of Fall 2003 Fellows

Number of Schools with Fall 2003 Fellows

Fall 2003 Fellows per School

Average

Maximum

Bronx

936

215

4.35

20

Brooklyn

698

237

2.95

11

Manhattan

417

123

3.39

26

Queens

365

136

2.68

12

Staten Island

14

8

1.75

4

Not school-specific

12

--

--

--

All Boroughs

2,442

719

2.77

26

SOURCE:  NYC DOE September 2004.

NOTE:  “Not school-specific” assignments included assignments in non-public schools and the Teacher Reserve Pool.

Fellows per school

          One in three of the schools with fall 2003 Fellows had only one new Fellow.   Two in three of the schools had less than four fall 2003 Fellows (See Table 2.2).

Table 2.2

Distribution of Schools and Fellows by Number of Fellows per School
 

Number of Fall 2003 Fellows per School

Schools

Fall 2003 Fellows

Number

Percent

Number