No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB)
Main NCLB NYS
Field Memo
#08-2003
|
Print Field Memo #08-2003 as or PDF or
WORD
|
THE STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT / THE UNIVERSITY
OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK / ALBANY, NY 12234
|
|
Johanna Duncan-Poitier
Deputy Commissioner
Office of Higher Education
Office of the Professions
|
James A. Kadamus
Deputy Commissioner
Office of Elementary, Middle,
Secondary and Continuing Education
|
NYS NCLB
Field Memo:
Date:
|
#08-2003
October 2, 2003 |
|
To: |
Charter Schools; Deans,
Directors and Chairs of Teacher Education; District Superintendents of Schools; New York State Standards and Practices Board for Teaching;
Nonpublic School Administrators; Regional Certification
Officers; Superintendents of Public Schools |
|
From: |
Johanna Duncan-Poitier
and James A. Kadamus |
|
Subject: |
Updated Information on the High Objective Uniform State Standard of Evaluation (HOUSSE) and Data Reporting to Comply with the NCLB |
This field memo explains the New York State Education Department's policy on
using the “high objective uniform State standard of evaluation” to determine
whether a teacher is “highly qualified” for Basic Educational Data System (BEDS)
reports due in fall 2003.
Fall 2003 BEDS
The New York State Education Department (SED) is required to submit a State
Consolidated Application to the U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) each
September in order to receive funds under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001.
In this year's application, which was due on September 1, SED was required to
report on the following performance indicators for teacher quality:
• the percentage of classes in core academic subjects taught by highly qualified
teachers, as defined by the NCLB (in the aggregate and for high-poverty
schools);
• the percentage of teachers of core academic subjects receiving high-quality
professional development, as defined by the NCLB; and
• the percentage of Title I paraprofessionals who are “qualified” as defined by
the NCLB.
SED has been issuing guidance about the NCLB's requirements for teachers and
paraprofessionals for over a year and asking local educational agencies (LEAs)
to ensure that they were complying with the NCLB's requirements in their local
consolidated applications for NCLB funds. However, SED did not have the required
data on teacher quality to submit to the USDOE this fall. SED did not begin
collecting the required NCLB data in fall 2002 because it did not have final
guidance and definitions from the USDOE until December 2002 and was consulting
until this summer with the Committee of Practitioners, as required by the NCLB,
to finalize its State definitions.
To indicate that New York State is moving toward full compliance with the NCLB's
reporting requirements on teacher quality, New York's 2003-2004 State
consolidated application to the USDOE indicated that SED will be collecting the
data required by the NCLB starting in fall 2003. SED alerted school districts
about BEDS changes in the School Executives Bulletin issued in summer 2003 that
is available at
http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/SB/sum03site/whatsnewa03.html .
Several changes to the Basic Educational Data System (BEDS) in fall 2003 were
needed to comply with the NCLB.
• Two data elements were added to the BEDS Personnel Master File (PMF) forms
completed by teachers.
-- One new item asks each teacher to report whether he or she received
high-quality professional development, as defined by the NCLB, in school year
2002-2003, the prior school year. We recommend that the LEA school should
identify for teachers the professional development activities that would qualify
as high quality.
-- Each teacher is asked to indicate whether he or she is highly qualified for
each teaching assignment in a core academic subject that the teacher reports. As
needed for specific teaching assignments that SED cannot identify as “core” or
“not core,” such as teaching assignments in Career and Technical Education,
teachers are asked to indicate whether their teaching assignments are “not
core.”
• There is a new Report on Title I Paraprofessionals for each district as a
supplement to the Institutional Master File (IMF) reports.
• Each LEA was asked to submit a form to assure SED that the BEDS data
submitted by its teachers for NCLB purposes is accurate.
Scheduling Problem and Policy Response
SED understands that LEAs did not have enough time to use the “high objective
uniform State standard of evaluation” (HOUSSE) for veteran teachers, as
described in NCLB NYS Field Memo #05-2003, between August 1, when the HOUSSE
could first be used, and the fall 2003 BEDS reporting date. To address this
scheduling problem, we have made the following policy decisions as we move to
full compliance to implement the NCLB.
• LEAs that used a HOUSSE conducted on the basis of NCLB NYS Field Memo #05-2003
have completed the process for those teachers and that should be reflected on
the fall 2003 BEDS forms.
• LEAs that used the interim guidance to conduct HOUSSE for their teachers based
upon NCLB NYS Field Memo #01-2002 may also report those teachers as highly
qualified in the fall 2003 BEDS reports. However, teachers evaluated under the
interim guidance must be re-evaluated during the 2003-2004 academic year using
the final SED guidance in NCLB NYS Field Memo #05-2003 for determining whether
their teachers are highly qualified. This information would then be reported in
the fall 2004 BEDS forms.
• When the Department publishes information for the school report cards, it will
provide a complete explanation of the change in the standards for determining
whether teachers are highly qualified under HOUSSE and that such changes created
fluctuation in the data submitted by the districts. The Department will make it
clear that these changes were not based upon a diminution of the quality of
teachers in a district, but a change in how teachers were to be evaluated as
highly qualified under federal guidance.
• In the next several years, SED's public reports on teacher quality based on
BEDS data will explain that indicators of certified teachers are more reliable
than indicators of highly qualified teachers because the definition of highly
qualified teachers for the NCLB was not consistent in the first two years of
data collection.
Further Information
You can find further information about fall 2003 BEDS changes at
http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/irts/beds2003-04/home.html. You can find further
information about the NCLB's requirements for teachers and paraprofessionals in
NCLB NYS Field Memos available at
http://www.highered.nysed.gov/nclbhome.htm. You can also write to
nclbnys@mail.nysed.gov to get
answers to your specific questions.
|